Oracle DBA – A lifelong learning experience

Archive for the ‘Blogroll’ Category

ASM disks – lsdg compared with the v$asm_diskgroup view

Posted by John Hallas on July 8, 2016

What is the difference between the summaries of disk space on these two systems? Look at the free_usable_file_MB column and free space

System 1

ASMCMD [+] > lsdg
State    Type    Rebal  Sector  Block       AU   Total_MB   Free_MB  Req_mir_free_MB  Usable_file_MB  Offline_disks  Voting_files  Name
MOUNTED  NORMAL  N         512   4096  4194304   72769536   2031032           433152          798940              0             N  DATA_PEX0/
MOUNTED  NORMAL  N         512   4096  4194304  128286720  20004028          2672640         8665694              0             N  DATA_PEX1/
         Group                 Diskgroup     Total  Req'd     Free   Percent Disk Size Percent Percent  Disk
     Group Name       State      Redundancy       GB     GB       GB Imbalance  Variance    Free    Free Count
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- ------ -------- --------- --------- ------- ------- -----
         1 DATA_PEX0  MOUNTED    NORMAL       71,064    423    1,560       1.4        .0     2.2     3.5   168
         2 DATA_PEX1  MOUNTED    NORMAL      125,280  2,610   16,925        .1        .0    15.6    15.6    48

System 2

ASMCMD [+] > lsdg
State    Type    Rebal  Sector  Block       AU  Total_MB  Free_MB  Req_mir_free_MB  Usable_file_MB  Offline_disks  Voting_files  Name
MOUNTED  EXTERN  N         512   4096  1048576   2621412   595744                0          595744              0             N  DATA/
MOUNTED  EXTERN  N         512   4096  1048576   1048568   700029                0          700029              0             N  FRA/

                                                     Mirror                      Percent Minimum Maximum
           Group                 Diskgroup     Total  Req'd     Free   Percent Disk Size Percent Percent  Disk
     Group Name       State      Redundancy       GB     GB       GB Imbalance  Variance    Free    Free Count
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- ------ -------- --------- --------- ------- ------- -----
         1 DATA       MOUNTED    EXTERN        2,560      0      582        .2        .0    22.7    22.8    20
         2 FRA        MOUNTED    EXTERN        1,024      0      684        .0        .0    66.8    66.8     8

System 1 is an Exadata stack with NORMAL redundancy whereas System 2 uses EXTERNAL redundancy. All of our systems bar Exadata are configured with dynamic multi-pathing with external redundancy to ensure high availability. – we allow the SAN to manage redundancy

In system 1 when using the second query to interrogate the diskgroups it would appear that we have 1.5Tb of free space in DATA_PEX0  and yet the lsdg command indicates we only have 800Gb free. Quite a significant difference when we have a weekly growth rate of ~250Gb in that diskgroup

SELECT g.group_number  "Group" ,      g.name          "Group Name" ,      g.state         "State" ,      g.type          "Type" ,      g.total_mb/1024 "Total GB" ,      g.free_mb/1024  "Free GB" ,      100*(max((d.total_mb-d.free_mb)/d.total_mb)-min((d.total_mb-d.free_mb)/d.total_mb))/max((d.total_mb-d.free_mb)/d.total_mb) "Imbalance" ,      100*(max(d.total_mb)-min(d.total_mb))/max(d.total_mb) "Variance" ,      100*(min(d.free_mb/d.total_mb)) "MinFree" ,      100*(max(d.free_mb/d.total_mb)) "MaxFree" ,      count(*)        "DiskCnt" FROM v$asm_disk d, v$asm_diskgroup g WHERE d.group_number = g.group_number and d.group_number <> 0 and d.state = 'NORMAL' and d.mount_status = 'CACHED' GROUP BY g.group_number, g.name, g.state, g.type, g.total_mb, g.free_mb ORDER BY 1;

PS the code comes from a very good ASM script from this very blog

This blog by Harald van Breederode explains in a much better way than I could why the mirroring in normal redundancy uses additional space .

As we are quite space challenged on the Exadata storage at the moment I have been asked several times to explain the different values of free space that are being reported – now I can just point them to this blog entry which will re-direct them to Harald’s very good explanation.

Job done

 

 

 

 

Posted in ASM, Blogroll, Oracle | Tagged: , , , , | 6 Comments »

2010 in review

Posted by John Hallas on January 4, 2011

The stats helper monkeys at WordPress.com mulled over how this blog did in 2010, and here’s a high level summary of its overall blog health:

Healthy blog!

The Blog-Health-o-Meter™ reads Wow.

Crunchy numbers

Featured image

A helper monkey made this abstract painting, inspired by your stats.

The Louvre Museum has 8.5 million visitors per year. This blog was viewed about 120,000 times in 2010. If it were an exhibit at The Louvre Museum, it would take 5 days for that many people to see it.

In 2010, there were 35 new posts, growing the total archive of this blog to 110 posts. There were 34 pictures uploaded, taking up a total of 4mb. That’s about 3 pictures per month.

The busiest day of the year was December 13th with 620 views. The most popular post that day was Oracle changes core processor licensing factor for HP Itanium.

Where did they come from?

The top referring sites in 2010 were google.com, google.co.in, en.wordpress.com, oracamp.com, and forums.oracle.com.

Some visitors came searching, mostly for ora-19809, db_recovery_file_dest_size, library cache: mutex x, ora-19809: limit exceeded for recovery files, and ora-27054.

Attractions in 2010

These are the posts and pages that got the most views in 2010.

1

Oracle changes core processor licensing factor for HP Itanium December 2010
5 comments

2

ORA-19809: limit exceeded for recovery files – db_recovery_file_dest_size and archiver error July 2008
5 comments

3

Purging statistics from the SYSAUX tablespace May 2009
9 comments

4

RMAN backup script – example – logging output March 2008
1 comment

5

Applying the 10.2.0.4.1 Patch Set Update (PSU) July 2009
6 comments

Posted in Blogroll, Oracle | 2 Comments »